Just crybabies, that's what Fockewolf is - any normal person just shuts up and deals with the tools, the editor, the bnet they have..
So should the people in North Korea starving just stop their 'whining QQing'? I think people are entitled to get what could have easily been a part of launch three years ago. Were people just to stop their 'whining QQing' when Battle.net 0.2 came out with no chat channels?
And besides, Blizzard has changed UI two times already (You know how big that is for a company to change how almost everything in a game looks... twice?).
Activision Blizzard doesn't care about anything other then 'ESPORTS' these days, not caring about story, graphics, sound, or anything else. They just seem to snort cocaine and go on about ESPORTS all day.
When in reality custom content is a core part of Blizzard-RTSes. Here, I think Destiny puts it correctly:
It has been three years any real changes are not coming. They do not have a clue about anything in any element of game-development, and they have demonstrated this admirably.
Bad rating/reviews system on the SC2 Arcade
No ability to give feedback to the editor without making a rating, toxic voting with no filters to 1 star rating, dumb people that votes 5 stars stupid maps, etc. Sure it's the reviewer fault but a good rating system tries to filter the toxicity by giving more importance to clever ratings. Direct feedback for the editor is still lacking.
I think ratings should be cut out and only show reviews, or have something like reviews and ratings being private to the author for feedback only.
Well, we do live in the age of political correctness, especially since the brainwashed liberal youth voted for Obama. It's so god-damn retarde oh, I mean, 'exceptionally special.'
0
So should the people in North Korea starving just stop their 'whining QQing'? I think people are entitled to get what could have easily been a part of launch three years ago. Were people just to stop their 'whining QQing' when Battle.net 0.2 came out with no chat channels?
0
So this means you can easily create roofs for TPS and FPS maps?
0
Do you have facts? People just defend this game for the fact it has a Blizzard logo.
0
For a company of around 5,000 people, changing the Battle.net UI is not a big deal at all. The UI is a small problem compared to other matters.
0
'UI'
0
Activision Blizzard doesn't care about anything other then 'ESPORTS' these days, not caring about story, graphics, sound, or anything else. They just seem to snort cocaine and go on about ESPORTS all day.
When in reality custom content is a core part of Blizzard-RTSes. Here, I think Destiny puts it correctly:
http://www.reddit.com/r/starcraft/comments/11m21k/starcraft_2_will_be_dead_before_legacy_of_the/
It has been three years
any real changes are not coming. They do not have a clue about anything in any element of game-development, and they have demonstrated this admirably.0
Blizzard is listening, and they don't care. They just care about 'lol ESPORTS'
0
Make it about the pro-Mengsk Dominion post-HotS.
0
So the best solution is to simply have reviews and ratings private for the author.
Or a compromise for Deadzergling; have reviews public, but not ratings.
0
Incredible, I can't believe people are supporting the rating system.
0
Well, that's another problem with StarCraft II custom maps, you decide whether to play them or not
from a bunch of stars.0
I think ratings should be cut out and only show reviews, or have something like reviews and ratings being private to the author for feedback only.
0
I agree, Dariall. It's not your fault.
0
why so mean?
0
Well, we do live in the age of political correctness, especially since the brainwashed liberal youth voted for Obama. It's so god-damn retarde
oh, I mean, 'exceptionally special.'Should of voted Ron Paul when you got the chance