This site works best with JavaScript enabled. Please enable JavaScript to get the best experience from this site.
In a big open space, a tiny dot of no-pathing has a big impact on the average openness. This seems off.
Maybe a better calculation is, from this point, how many pathable cells are within radius R of here?
And if we're going to calculate that, maybe there should be an all-pairs shortest path or some results sharing to make this run a lot faster? To gauge this, print out the number of path-sources that were calculated for each map with all output settings, and see if its ANYWHERE near all-pairs.
To post a comment, please login or register a new account.