why would they upgrade a 10 year old game from something that its community is happy with... And NO TFT had NO STRATEGY it was 1 move wonder the whole time... It was always the same, Rush to hero, Run around with hero and 2-4 other basic units, Level up, Stomp your opponent without ever getting up a real army. And even if your opponent did get an army up, it was still 1 hitted by the crappy hero spells.
TFT Multi-player non custom game sucked donkey ass, The Campaign was amazing and VERY fun, but the online was hindered by low unit counts and Heroes that did nothing but stomp EVERYTHING and were countered by nothing.
Sc2 on the other hand you have multiple strategies for multiple phases of the game, In early game you can quick expand, Rush, Turtle, Etc, sometimes mixing and matching these. Then you have the Mid Game, in mid game you can continue to turtle while slowly expanding, You can at this point have your quick expansion taking off and you can now build up and army, OR expand again so you can dominate the late game. (i only named a few i am not going through the dozens of possibilities. just for mid game). and then by late game there are too many stratagies to count and the way Sc2 is balanced the units you were building in the beginning still have usefulness at the end meaning that there are tons of stratagies.
Dont say a game is unbalanced because the pros are sticking to 1 strategy, that's what they always do... a good strat is found everyone copies it and trys to improve on it, then it seems OP by their fans/fans of their opponents. Just think if you were going to enter a tournament, and everyone was saying that
Strat A > Strat B, aren't you going to use Strat A EVEN if Strat C really Stomps Strat A.
What? Do you know anything about games? First, A game should NEVER be balanced, if it was balanced that means there would be no need to patch it, gameplay would never change it and it would go stale in 3 months. You really think blizzard trys to balance Sc2? NO, they intentionally leave these Imbalances so that they can do something later to improve the game and keep it Perfectly Imbalanced, this gives a reason for players to return to the game and keep playing for years on end.
And if you dont like people with a higher APM winning, go play lame unrealistic turn based... Because no matter what game you play if it isnt turn based the guy with the best reflexes is going to win...
@EternalWraith: Go
why would they upgrade a 10 year old game from something that its community is happy with... And NO TFT had NO STRATEGY it was 1 move wonder the whole time... It was always the same, Rush to hero, Run around with hero and 2-4 other basic units, Level up, Stomp your opponent without ever getting up a real army. And even if your opponent did get an army up, it was still 1 hitted by the crappy hero spells.
TFT Multi-player non custom game sucked donkey ass, The Campaign was amazing and VERY fun, but the online was hindered by low unit counts and Heroes that did nothing but stomp EVERYTHING and were countered by nothing.
Sc2 on the other hand you have multiple strategies for multiple phases of the game, In early game you can quick expand, Rush, Turtle, Etc, sometimes mixing and matching these. Then you have the Mid Game, in mid game you can continue to turtle while slowly expanding, You can at this point have your quick expansion taking off and you can now build up and army, OR expand again so you can dominate the late game. (i only named a few i am not going through the dozens of possibilities. just for mid game). and then by late game there are too many stratagies to count and the way Sc2 is balanced the units you were building in the beginning still have usefulness at the end meaning that there are tons of stratagies.
Dont say a game is unbalanced because the pros are sticking to 1 strategy, that's what they always do... a good strat is found everyone copies it and trys to improve on it, then it seems OP by their fans/fans of their opponents. Just think if you were going to enter a tournament, and everyone was saying that Strat A > Strat B, aren't you going to use Strat A EVEN if Strat C really Stomps Strat A.
@EternalWraith: Go
then dont play it... who cares....
No strategy? yet you say TFT took strategy? that game was good for its custom scene but its melee was terrible.
I have to honestly say that was the most idiotic statement i have ever heard.
@EternalWraith: Go
What? Do you know anything about games? First, A game should NEVER be balanced, if it was balanced that means there would be no need to patch it, gameplay would never change it and it would go stale in 3 months. You really think blizzard trys to balance Sc2? NO, they intentionally leave these Imbalances so that they can do something later to improve the game and keep it Perfectly Imbalanced, this gives a reason for players to return to the game and keep playing for years on end.
And if you dont like people with a higher APM winning, go play lame unrealistic turn based... Because no matter what game you play if it isnt turn based the guy with the best reflexes is going to win...