I have this problem fixed now. The problem was that some attachments have a 'volume' entry in the model files. As far as I can tell, these volumes are only used for the attachments 'Ref_Target' and 'Ref_Shield'. This volume is defined as a radius or 'spread' around the attachment point. I've fixed the exporter to support this now whenever you create a Ref_Target or Ref_Shield attachment and it'll be included in the next update. At the moment, the radius will have to be a number rather than a visual element (I envision a 'sphere' around the attachment would do the job if I were to make it a visual element) but that may change in future updates if I figure something out.
I've tested this out on the zealot as it has two hit regions, shield hit region and once shields are depleted a 'chassis' hit region. It works well. The next update to the tools will add this feature and should fix up your issue tFighterPilot.
I have this problem fixed now. The problem was that some attachments have a 'volume' entry in the model files. As far as I can tell, these volumes are only used for the attachments 'Ref_Target' and 'Ref_Shield'. This volume is defined as a radius or 'spread' around the attachment point. I've fixed the exporter to support this now whenever you create a Ref_Target or Ref_Shield attachment and it'll be included in the next update. At the moment, the radius will have to be a number rather than a visual element (I envision a 'sphere' around the attachment would do the job if I were to make it a visual element) but that may change in future updates if I figure something out.
I've tested this out on the zealot as it has two hit regions, shield hit region and once shields are depleted a 'chassis' hit region. It works well. The next update to the tools will add this feature and should fix up your issue tFighterPilot.
@tFighterPilot: Go
Going to be looking into this problem shortly. I have a fair idea where the problem is.